Ircam-Centre Pompidou

Recherche

  • Recherche simple
  • Recherche avancée

    Panier électronique

    Votre panier ne contient aucune notice

    Connexion à la base

  • Identification
    (Identifiez-vous pour accéder aux fonctions de mise à jour. Utilisez votre login-password de courrier électronique)

    Entrepôt OAI-PMH

  • Soumettre une requête

    Consulter la notice détailléeConsulter la notice détaillée
    Version complète en ligneVersion complète en ligne
    Version complète en ligne accessible uniquement depuis l'IrcamVersion complète en ligne accessible uniquement depuis l'Ircam
    Ajouter la notice au panierAjouter la notice au panier
    Retirer la notice du panierRetirer la notice du panier

  • English version
    (full translation not yet available)
  • Liste complète des articles

  • Consultation des notices


    Vue détaillée Vue Refer Vue Labintel Vue BibTeX  

    Catégorie de document Article paru dans une revue
    Titre Identification of Concurrent Harmonic and Inharmonic Vowels
    Sous-titre A Test of the Theory of Harmonic Cancellation and Enhancement
    Auteur principal Alain De Cheveigné
    Co-auteurs Stephen McAdams, Jean Laroche, Muriel Rosenberg
    Paru dans JASA: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995, Vol. 7, n° 97
    Comité de lecture Oui
    Collation p.3736-3748
    Copyright ASA
    Année 1995
    Statut éditorial Publié
    Résumé

    The improvement of identification accuracy of concurrent vowels with differences in fundamental frequency ([DELTA]F0) is usually attributed to mecanisms that exploit harmonic structure. To decide whether identification is aided primarily by the harmonic structure of the target ("harmonic enhancement") or that of the ground ("harmonic cancellation"), pairs of synthetic vowels, each of which was either harmonic or inharmonic, were presented to listeners for identification. Responses for each vowel were scored according to the vowel's harmonicity, the harmonicity of the vowel that accompanied it, and [DELTA]F0. For a given target, identification was better by about 3% for a harmonic ground unless the target was also harmonic with the same F0. This supports the cancellation hypothesis. Identification was worse for harmonic than for inharmonic targets by 3-8%. This does not support the enhancement hypothesis. When both vowels were harmonic, identification was better by about 6% when the F0s differed by 1/2 semitone. However, when at least one vowel was inharmonic, [DELTA]F0 had no significant effect. Identification of constituents of pairs was generally not the same when the target was harmonic and the ground inharmonic or vice-versa. Results are interpreted in terms of harmonic enhancement and harmonic cancellation, and alternative explanations such as phase effects are considered.

    Mots-clés concurrent vowels / fundamental frequency / harmonic vowel
    Equipe Perception et cognition musicales
    Cote DeCheveigne95b
    Adresse de la version en ligne http://articles.ircam.fr/textes/DeCheveigne95b

    © Ircam - Centre Pompidou 2005.