Ircam-Centre Pompidou

Recherche

  • Recherche simple
  • Recherche avancée

    Panier électronique

    Votre panier ne contient aucune notice

    Connexion à la base

  • Identification
    (Identifiez-vous pour accéder aux fonctions de mise à jour. Utilisez votre login-password de courrier électronique)

    Entrepôt OAI-PMH

  • Soumettre une requête

    Consulter la notice détailléeConsulter la notice détaillée
    Version complète en ligneVersion complète en ligne
    Version complète en ligne accessible uniquement depuis l'IrcamVersion complète en ligne accessible uniquement depuis l'Ircam
    Ajouter la notice au panierAjouter la notice au panier
    Retirer la notice du panierRetirer la notice du panier

  • English version
    (full translation not yet available)
  • Liste complète des articles

  • Consultation des notices


    Vue détaillée Vue Refer Vue Labintel Vue BibTeX  

    %0 Journal Article
    %A Urdapilleta, Isabel
    %A Giboreaub, A
    %A Manetta, Céline
    %A Houix, O
    %A Richard, Jean-François
    %T The mental context for the description of odors: a semantic space : le contexte mental dans la description des odeurs : un espace sémantique
    %D 2006
    %B Revue européenne de psychologie
    %F Urdapilleta06a
    %K Odor; Olfactory description; Categorization entailment; Semantic classification
    %X The experiments conducted in this research aimed to increase our understanding of olfactory properties and classify them hierarchically through entailment. The research objective was to build an odor classification based on internal knowledge (i.e. mental context). Twelve floral scents were described freely by 60 participants. First, three sensory judges undertook a semantic analysis of the 1145 olfactory terms gathered. Secondly, a study of the entailment between olfactory properties was conducted using 42 subjects working on four lists of terms describing the characteristics of floral perfumes. The results confirmed the hypothesis that olfactory properties show tree-like structure. This allowed us to propose a classification system composed of two superordinate categories: First, objects, being olfactory sources, constitute the first category and are considered as olfactory properties themselves (i.e. civilization, food and natural sources). Second non-objects properties are those applic- able to a diversity of objects: (i.e. properties, such as objects’ physical state: sensory, intensity, space, time) and those related to the subject (as personal feelings and value judgments). Based on these results, it appears that olfactory properties can be organized as a semantic network in line with the general theory of categorization.
    %1 1
    %2 3

    © Ircam - Centre Pompidou 2005.