Ircam-Centre Pompidou

Recherche

  • Recherche simple
  • Recherche avancée

    Panier électronique

    Votre panier ne contient aucune notice

    Connexion à la base

  • Identification
    (Identifiez-vous pour accéder aux fonctions de mise à jour. Utilisez votre login-password de courrier électronique)

    Entrepôt OAI-PMH

  • Soumettre une requête

    Consulter la notice détailléeConsulter la notice détaillée
    Version complète en ligneVersion complète en ligne
    Version complète en ligne accessible uniquement depuis l'IrcamVersion complète en ligne accessible uniquement depuis l'Ircam
    Ajouter la notice au panierAjouter la notice au panier
    Retirer la notice du panierRetirer la notice du panier

  • English version
    (full translation not yet available)
  • Liste complète des articles

  • Consultation des notices


    Vue détaillée Vue Refer Vue Labintel Vue BibTeX  

    %0 Journal Article
    %A Houix, Olivier
    %A Lemaitre, Guillaume
    %A Misdariis, Nicolas
    %A Susini, Patrick
    %A Urdapilleta, Isabel
    %T A Lexical Analysis of Environmental Sound Categories
    %D 2012
    %B Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
    %V 18
    %N 1
    %P 52-80
    %F Houix12a
    %K environmental sounds
    %K categorization
    %K similarity
    %K classification task
    %K lexical analysis
    %X In this article we report on listener categorization of meaningful environmental sounds. A starting point for this study was the phenomenological taxonomy proposed by Gaver (1993b). In the first experimental study, 15 participants classified 60 environmental sounds and indicated the properties shared by the sounds in each class. In a second experimental study, 30 participants classified and described 56 sounds exclusively made by solid objects. The participants were required to concentrate on the actions causing the sounds independent of the sound source. The classifications were analyzed with a specific hierar- chical cluster technique that accounted for possible cross-classifications, and the verbalizations were submitted to statistical lexical analyses. The results of the first study highlighted 4 main categories of sounds: solids, liquids, gases, and machines. The results of the second study indicated a distinction between discrete interactions (e.g., impacts) and continuous interactions (e.g., tearing) and suggested that actions and objects were not independent organizational principles. We propose a general structure of environmental sound categorization based on the sounds’ temporal patterning, which has practical implications for the automatic classification of environmental sounds.
    %1 1
    %2 3
    %U http://architexte.ircam.fr/textes/Houix12a/

    © Ircam - Centre Pompidou 2005.