Recherche

Recherche simple

Recherche avancée

Panier électronique

Votre panier ne contient aucune notice

Connexion à la base

Identification

(Identifiez-vous pour accéder aux fonctions de mise à jour. Utilisez votre login-password de courrier électronique)

Entrepôt OAI-PMH

Soumettre une requête

	Consulter la notice détaillée
	Version complète en ligne
	Version complète en ligne accessible uniquement depuis l'Ircam
	Ajouter la notice au panier
	Retirer la notice du panier

English version

(full translation not yet available)

Liste complète des articles

Consultation des notices

Vue détaillée

Vue Refer

Vue Labintel

Vue BibTeX

%0 Journal Article
%A De Cheveigné, Alain
%A McAdams, Stephen
%A Marin, Cécile
%T Concurrent Vowel Identification.II : effects of Phase, Harmonicity, and Task
%D 1997
%B JASA: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
%V 101
%N 5
%P 2848-2856
%F Cheveigne97a
%K vowel identification
%K harmonicity
%K phase effects
%K harmonic cancellationharmonic enhancement
%K fundamental frequency
%X Subjects identified concurrent synthetic vowel pairs in four experiments. The first experiment found that improvements in vowel identification with a difference in fundamental frequency do not depend on component phase. The second investigated more precisely whether phase patterns resulting from ongoing phase shifts in inharmonic stimuli can by themselves produce effects similar to those attributed to differences in harmonic state of component vowels. No such effects were found. The third experiment found that identification was better for harmonic than for inharmonic backgrounds, and that it did ot depend on target harmonicity. The first three experiments employed a task in which subjects were free to report one or two vowels for each stimulus. The fourth experiment reproduced several conditions with a more classic task in which subjects had to report two vowels. Compared to the classic task, the new task gave larger effects and provided an additional measure of segregation : the number of vowels reported per stimulus. Overall, resuls were consistent with the hypothesis that the auditory system segregates targets by a mechanism of harmonic cancellation of competiting vowels. They did not support the hypothesis of harmonic enhancement of targets. The lack of a phase effect places strong constraints on models that exploit pitch period asynchrony.
%1 1
%2 3